Legal Opinion

Richard Oduol v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided May 10, 2006No. 10-05-00386-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-05-00386-CR

Richard Oduol,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Criminal Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1319226

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant has represented himself at trial and continues to do so on appeal. However, the record does not reflect that he has waived the right to counsel in writing or that he has been admonished of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. In addition, Appellant contends that the reporter’s record is inaccurate. Accordingly, we will abate the appeal for the trial court to resolve…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hatten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  4. East v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Lomax v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API