Legal Opinion

In Re Sause Bros. Ocean Towing

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 9, 1991No. Civ. 89-609-REPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINAL AMENDED OPINION

(this opinion reflects all amendments thereof to date)

REDDEN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Sause Brothers Ocean Towing (SBOT) is an Oregon corporation with its principal place of business in the State of Oregon. At the time of the casualty, SBOT was registered to do business in the State of Washington. SBOT filed this maritime claim for exoneration from or limitation of liability in accordance with 46 U.S.C.App. § 183, and Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SBOT filed this limitation action following…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. The CaledoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Tug Ocean Prince, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. AMERICAN RIVER TRANS. v. Paragon Marine ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002
  2. In re: M/V YochowDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  3. Sause Brothers Ocean Towing Co., Inc., a Corporation, as Owner/charter T/v Ocean Service v. David Leblanc (Leblanc Claimants), Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API