Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Selmonsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1962Published

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

In this action on a foreign judgment plaintiffs move for an order striking out paragraphs of the defendant’s answer upon the ground that they are sham and frivolous and for summary judgment. Defendant cross-moves for an order pursuant to section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act directing that the third-party defendants be deemed parties to the plaintiffs’ motion and that plaintiffs’ motion be adjourned until all the pleadings in the third-party action shall have been served and the third-party action at issue.

The facts culled from the pleadings, affidavits and exhibits submitted reveal the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Kamp v. . KampNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Claim of Doey v. Clarence P. Howland Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Johnston v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Dunstan v. . HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API