Legal Opinion

In re Bartholomew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1996Published

1Per curiam

By decision dated July 9,1993, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months (Matter of Bartholomew, 195 AD2d 753). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised, that it does not oppose the application. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BartholomewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API