Dumas v. State

On March 28, 1923, appellant, with another, was charged by affidavit with having posses sion and control of a certain manufacturing device, still and manufacturing material for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Counsel for the state seem to be under the impression that the affidavit herein was predicated upon §1, Acts 1921 p. 736, amending §4 of an act approved February 9, 1917. Acts 1917 p. 15. However, the record before us affirmatively shows that the charge was based upon §1 of an act approved March 1, 1923. Acts 1923 p. 107. The judgment, in addition to a fine, was that appellant be…