Legal Opinion

Duty v. Arkansas Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1990No. 90-172PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

James A. Duty petitions for certiorari seeking to have this court review the record of the disposition of a complaint he filed with the respondent, Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission. We deny the petition.

The petitioner filed a notice with this court that he wished to appeal from the disposition of a complaint he has filed with the commission. He then filed a document styled “Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Complete the Record,” and asked that copies of the commission record of the disposition of his complaint be furnished to him.

Rule 12F of the commission’s rules…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Huffman v. Arkansas Judicial Disipline & Disability CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Norwood v. DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Doug Norwood v. Betty DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Huffman v. Arkansas Judicial Disipline & Disability CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Perroni v. SacharSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API