Integrated Direct Marketing, LLC v. May
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Drew May’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, which seeks a ruling that Plaintiff Integrated Direct Marketing, LLC’s conversion claim fails on the basis that Arkansas law does not provide a cause of action for conversion of non-trade secret electronic data. For the reasons that follow, the Court will move the Arkansas Supreme Court to answer one question of law because the remaining claim in this litigation presents an unresolved question of Arkansas law that may be determinative of this pending civil action.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Burbach Broadcasting Company of Delaware v. Elkins Radio Corporation Cat Radio IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.