Copeland v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
The probationary split sentence imposed on appellant is not illegal. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988); Carter v. State, 552 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). However, the trial court did err by sentencing appellant in excess of the one-cell bump-up for probation violation. See Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989). Additionally, the trial court erred by failing to give appellant credit for all earned gain-time. See Green v. State, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989); Melvin v. State, 553 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Latham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992