Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rubin v. Rubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 21, 1986Published

1DissentEllerin, J.

The primary concern of a court in determining an application for modification of child support payments is the best interests of the child. (Matter of *157Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132, 141; Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210, 212.) Since the trial court properly considered the best interests of the child in vacating the provisions of the separation agreement and divorce judgment, directing payment of $500 per month for child support, and ordering instead payments of $850 per month, I would affirm that portion of the judgment of Justice Wolin appealed from.

It is undisputed that there has been a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Verrone v. VoegtleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API