Legal Opinion

Buffalo Cadillac Corp. v. Eisele

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Habéis, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover judgment for the sum of $2,036, being the amount of deficit created on the sale of a Cadillac automobile after the retaking of such automobile by the plaintiff from the defendant under the terms of a conditional sales contract. Such conditional sales contract was executed and delivery of such automobile was made on or about the 2d day of May, 1932. On delivery of the_ automobile the sum of $1,829.25 was paid by the defendant to the plaintiff on account of the purchase price of $3,467.25. On June 2, 1932, a further payment of $102 was made by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurley v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Appeal Printing Co. v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Gaffney v. BigelowNew York Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Jacobs v. HookerNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Manchester v. Van BruntNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Corp. v. OrnsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Fields v. Western Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API