Commonwealth v. Matias
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUSMANNO, J.:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the Order granting the Post Conviction Relief Act1 (“PCRA”) Petition filed by Sixto Matías (“Matías”), and granting Matías a new trial. We affirm.
*809In its Opinion, the PCRA court recounted the history underlying the instant appeal as follows:
In July [ ] 2007, [Matías] was charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (IDSI) [] in violation of 18 Pa. C.S.[A.] § 3128; aggravated indecent assault [] in violation of 18 Pa.C.S.[A.] § 8125; indecent assault[ ] in violation of 18 Pa.C.S.[A.] § 3127; and corruption of minors [ ]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Orner, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Orner, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Arana, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Armstrong, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.