Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Matias

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 2013PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the Order granting the Post Conviction Relief Act1 (“PCRA”) Petition filed by Sixto Matías (“Matías”), and granting Matías a new trial. We affirm.

*809In its Opinion, the PCRA court recounted the history underlying the instant appeal as follows:

In July [ ] 2007, [Matías] was charged with involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (IDSI) [] in violation of 18 Pa. C.S.[A.] § 3128; aggravated indecent assault [] in violation of 18 Pa.C.S.[A.] § 8125; indecent assault[ ] in violation of 18 Pa.C.S.[A.] § 3127; and corruption of minors [ ]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. SneedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Com. v. Orner, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Com. v. Orner, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Arana, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Armstrong, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API