Legal Opinion

State v. Price

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2005No. 26318PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

A jury found Clayton Price (“Defendant”) guilty of statutory sodomy in the first degree (§ 566.062). 1 On appeal, Defendant charges the trial court committed plain error on four separate occasions when it did not sua sponte exclude certain at-trial testimony. 2 We affirm.

FACTS

Since Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence that the jury heard in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, disregarding all contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Lopez, 128 S.W.3d 195, 196[1] (Mo.App.2004).

M.A. (“Victim”), born June 16,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. ArtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. FewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API