Wilson v. Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we must decide whether the district court abused its discretion in denying appellants’ motion, brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), for relief from its denial of an injunction. Since we conclude that the district court properly found that the newly discovered evidence underlying this motion was merely cumulative of previously considered evidence and showed no fraud by an adverse party, we affirm its denial of the motion for modification of the prior order.
We have presented the underlying facts of this case in our two prior decisions in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Quincy Lairsey and Frances Lairsey v. The Advance Abrasives CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. The Ss Zoe Colocotroni, Her Engines, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- James W. Bonar and Beverly J. Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John S. Mc Nally, Jr., Ed LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Edith Stridiron v. Andre StridironCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Roni K. Dogherra v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Ellie Marie Parks and Willis Eugene Parks v. U. S. Life and Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.