Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Onstott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1944No. 5623PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOKES, Justice.

This is an action for damages instituted by the appellee, B. R.. Onstott, against the appellant, Z. P. Lusk, in which appellee alleged his land had been damaged by overflow surface waters precipitated upon it by the act of appellant in cutting a ditch across the intersection of two public roads. The case was submitted to a jury upon special issues, in answer to which the jury found that by digging certain irrigation ditches upon his land the appellant had changed the natural flow of surface waters thereon, causing an accumulation of such waters in the southeast portion of his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. City of Austin v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Foley v. NorthrupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Sparks v. PonderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sheffield Division, Armco Steel Corporation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Wright v. E-Z Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Bernal v. SeittTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Valdez v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1988
  5. Pacific Finance Corp. v. GilkersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API