Legal Opinion

Meoli v. Heartwell Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hoggard)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 27, 2005No. 19-01381Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JEFFREY R. HUGHES, Bankruptcy Judge.

Each of these adversary proceedings involve one or more motions for summary judgment. The motions all relate to my decision in Richardson v. Countrywide Home Loans (In re Gregory), 316 B.R. 82 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.2004). I determined in Gregory that Boyd v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. (In re Kroskie), 315 F.3d 644 (6th Cir.2003) was no longer applicable because of the enactment in Michigan of Revised Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. The trustees in each of these adversary proceedings contend that Gregory is wrong and that therefore I should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Damon J. And Regina M. Kroskie, Debtors. James W. Boyd, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Citicorp Trust Bank v. Meoli (In Re Oswalt)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
  3. Richardson v. Countrywide Home Loans (In Re Gregory)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API