Black Unity League of Ky. v. Miller
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Appellant organizations brought this suit for injunc-tive and declaratory relief against investigations which appellees, members of the Kentucky Un-American Activities Committee, were allegedly threatening to conduct. They contended that the investigations and accompanying contempt prosecutions would violate various rights, primarily those under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. They did not allege that any of their officers or members had been called as witnesses, or that any subpoenas had been issued, or that any criminal prosecutions had been begun. The allegations of harassment were…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Maupin v. StansburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Robert Fanty v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare and Helene Wohlgemuth, Secretary of the Department of Public Welfare of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Eloise Randle, in No. 76-1968 v. Helene Wohlgemuth, Individually and as Secretary of the Department of Public Welfare, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Health and Welfare Building, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, in No. 76-1969Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Cherry v. Postmaster General of the United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Williams v. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- 16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 724, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8058 Deborah Williams v. W. H. "Pete" McClellan Individually and in His Official Capacity as Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.