Legal Opinion

Howell v. Bankston

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1935No. 10500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

W. J. Bankston and .two other persons, as duly appointed and qualified county registrars, instituted mandamus proceedings to. compel the board of commissioners of roads and revenues of Butts County to- issue a warrant on the county treasurer for a stated amount due the petitioners for preparing the “lists of voters” for the year 1934. The defendants interposed a demurrer on the grounds: (1) that the petition sets out no cause of action, there being no authority for mandamus to pay an unliquidated demand; the petition showing only an account which must be reduced to judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garrison v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Culberson v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Tucker v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Baggett v. BarrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franklin v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Mobley v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Murphey v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Wallace & Tiernan Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Leverette v. LeonardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API