Legal Opinion

Eyedent v. Vickers Management

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 20, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis R. Friedman, J.

This proceeding has been commenced pursuant to Housing *482Maintenance Code (HMC) § D26-51.01 (h) (Administrative Code of City of New York) for an order directing the owner and managing agent (collectively, the owners; see, HMC § D26-1.07 [45]) to remove the "conditions constituting violations” at the premises. One of the exterior walls at 41-43 Avenue B (the premises) has collapsed. The building has been vacated as the result of a Department of Buildings (DOB) vacate order; the tenants, petitioners here, are temporarily housed elsewhere. The Department of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Corbett v. . Spring Garden Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Various Tenants of 515 East 12th Street v. 515 East 12th Street Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985
  3. Corbett v. Spring Garden InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Fernandez v. Tsoumpas Bros.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  5. Bing Chung Chan v. 60 Eldridge Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eyedent v. Vickers ManagementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Yokley v. Henry-Clark AssociatesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995
  3. Bernard v. ScharfCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API