Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Continental Casualty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIS, L-

Grant MeOartney was, on the twenty-eighth day of December, 1923, and for some years prior thereto had been, a licensed real estate broker under the provisions of an act of the legislature of this state (Stats. 1919, p. 1252). On that day the plaintiff deposited with him the sum of two thousand dollars, which sum of money he was to use in making the first payment on a piece of real property which plaintiff had agreed to purchase. He failed to use said money for that purpose, but evidently converted the same to his own use, and some time subsequent to the sixth day of March, 1924, he…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gospel Army v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ferrarell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Kaufman v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ingram v. GlissmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Gospel Army v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API