Legal Opinion

Walls v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 26, 1983No. CR 83-90PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant’s conviction and four year sentence for the crime of possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell and/or deliver was affirmed by the Arkansas Court of Appeals with three judges dissenting as to the trial court’s refusal to grant appellant a continuance. Walls v. State, 8 Ark. App. 315, 652 S.W.2d 37 (1983). We granted his petition for review.

At trial the appellant offered the affirmative defense of entrapment. The pertinent facts upon which that defense was based are that prior to the alleged sale, the appellant became acquainted with John Robert…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Swindler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Spears v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Tyler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Orsini v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. State v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Baumgarner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API