Legal Opinion
Angelucci v. Sands
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 2002PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Since a judgment has been entered in favor of the defendants and third-party defendants, after trial, which is being affirmed by this Court (see Angelucci v Sands, 297 AD2d 764 [decided herewith]), any determination regarding the summary judgment motion will not affect the rights of the parties (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714). Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Angelucci v. SandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Baez v. Cow Bay ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Schultz v. NoellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ledwin v. AumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Maurice H. v. Charity C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.