State v. Watson
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Defendant’s petition for a new trial of an indictment.
1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.
The defendant, who has been convicted of the crime of adultery with one Mary A. Watson, now petitions for a new trial on numerous grounds, the substance of which, so far as we are able to understand them from the confused statement thereof, is that the verdict is against the evidence and that the court erred in certain rulings which will be hereinafter mentioned.
The uncontradicted testimony offered by the State shows that the defendant lived with the said Mary A. Watson as his wife for nearly six years, during two of which he lived with her in Hopkinton in this State, and that he had three…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bomsta v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. InnessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
- Kohlheimer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
- Western Horse & Cattle Insurance v. O'NeillNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- McKee v. BevinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.