Legal Opinion
Stack v. Perez
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 26, 2003No. 3:01-cr-00260PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
ELLEN BREE BURNS, Senior District Judge.
After initially denying the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Lourdes Perez (“Defendant” or “Perez”) for failure, on two occasions, to comply with Local Rule 9(c), the Court converted the Motion to a Motion to Dismiss and directed the parties to brief the issue of the “color of law” requirement for an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Court now holds that the Motion for Summary Judgment, construed as a Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 67], is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
The Supreme…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Griffin v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mellaly v. Eastman Kodak Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. Edward Jones & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Belton v. WydraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021