Poirier v. Venus Shoe Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.
The plaintiff, a shoe factory employee, sustained personal injuries, under circumstances which, she alleges, entitle her to damages from the corporate defendant, her employer.
The theory of this action is a failure, sounding in negligence, *101and amounting to a lack, on the part of the defendant, of the exercise of ordinary care to keep a certain sewing machine in a reasonably safé and reasonably suitable condition for use.
On November 26, 1937, plaintiff was about to begin her daily work of running the machine.
She contends that repeated movement of the machine needle, first down and then up,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Staples v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- Jordan v. HilbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- McCausland v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Bourisk v. Mohican Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Nadeau v. Caribou Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lipman Poultry Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958