Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Calandro

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1979No. Nos. 78-2028, 79-850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, City of Miami, contends that the trial court erred in granting the appel-lee/plaintiff’s motion in limine and/or motion to exclude testimony as to appellee’s addiction to drugs at the trial of the personal injury action filed against the City of Miami.

Carl Calandro sustained bodily injuries after he hit a pothole in the street at N.W. 3rd Avenue and 14th Street while driving his motorcycle, and he filed suit against the city for damages. Through discovery procedures, it was learned that Carl Calandro had had a long-standing drug problem and was being treated as an out-patient at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Morrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Perper v. EdellSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  4. Hull v. GreeleySupreme Court of Florida · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clausell v. BuckneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Kutner v. State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor VehiclesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API