Legal Opinion

Corthran v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1997No. S97A0796PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

We granted Claude Emmet Corthran, Jr.’s application for interlocutory appeal to consider whether the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress his videotaped statement. Because Corthran gave the statement as part of a plea bargain agreement, we hold that the statement is inadmissible and reverse.

A grand jury indicted Corthran for malice murder, felony murder, armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. During plea negotiations, Corthran agreed to plead guilty to felony murder in exchange for the state dismissing the robbery…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. People v. GarciaColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Redwine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Corthran v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API