Yellowstone County v. Wight
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON:
I dissent. Historically this court has adhered to the rule that it will presume that the rulings and judgment of the trial court are correct unless the record shows affirmative error, and that is particularly true in a case such as we have here, where the record is not before us. In Ringling v. Smith River Development Co., 48 Mont. 467, 138 Pac. 1098, after stating the general rule, we said: “In the absence of any evidence disclosing the circumstances under which the securities were given, * * * and, indeed, in the absence of the writing assigning either the contract or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Suburban Homes Co. v. NorthMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- McBride v. School District No. 2Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- Fratt v. Daniels-Jones Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
- Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Smith v. CollisMontana Supreme Court · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.