Legal Opinion

Sansom v. . Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

Tbe plaintiff N. M. Johnson bas evidenced a chain of paper title from tbe common source sufficient, nothing else appearing, to establish bis right to be declared tbe owner of tbe lands in controversy. So bas tbe defendant. However, although defendant bas a priority in point of time of conveyance, tbe plaintiff’s deeds were recorded first. But for our Registration Act, 0. S., 3309, known as tbe Connor Act by virtue of tbe 1885 Amendment, tbe defendant, having tbe first conveyance, would have tbe superior title. Tbis familiar statute reads in part: “No conveyance of land, or contract to convey,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Sills v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. King v. . McRackanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Wood v. Tinsley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. M. & J. Finance Corp. v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. E. A. Wight v. R. J. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  3. Rowe v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API