Legal Opinion

Boyd v. R. P. Farnsworth & Co.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 13, 1952No. Civ. A. 3220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, District Judge.

This is a suit for workman’s compensation based on the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Statute, LSA-R.S. 23:1021 et seq.. The only issue presented for adjudication is whether or not the plaintiff should be required to undergo a surgical operation. After consideration of the testimony and the briefs filed by both sides, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Findings of Fact

1. On March 15, 1951 plaintiff suffered a crushing injury to his left foot when the caterpillar tread supporting a heavy crane ran over that foot. At the time plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. PinkstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. W. Horace Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Oscar L. Strickland, and Cross-Appellee v. W. Horace Williams Company, Inc., and the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., and Cross-Appellants. W. Horace Williams Company, Inc., and the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., and Cross-Appellants v. Oscar L. Strickland, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Daniel Ornamental Iron Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API