Boyd v. R. P. Farnsworth & Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, District Judge.
This is a suit for workman’s compensation based on the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Statute, LSA-R.S. 23:1021 et seq.. The only issue presented for adjudication is whether or not the plaintiff should be required to undergo a surgical operation. After consideration of the testimony and the briefs filed by both sides, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact
1. On March 15, 1951 plaintiff suffered a crushing injury to his left foot when the caterpillar tread supporting a heavy crane ran over that foot. At the time plaintiff…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. PinkstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Strickland v. W. Horace Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Oscar L. Strickland, and Cross-Appellee v. W. Horace Williams Company, Inc., and the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., and Cross-Appellants. W. Horace Williams Company, Inc., and the Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., and Cross-Appellants v. Oscar L. Strickland, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Daniel Ornamental Iron Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972