Legal Opinion

Rosegartin v. Cohen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The declaration alleges in substance that, when the plaintiff entered the employ of the defendant as a salesman, the defendant promised to pay him in addition to his salary twenty-five per cent “of the net profit upon the business secured by the plaintiff; which was to be paid at the end of one year from the day the plaintiff entered the defendant’s employ”; that either party, if dissatisfied with the other, might at any time terminate the contract; that during the employment the total amount of business procured by the plaintiff “netted a total income of $39,990.68, with a gross profit of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pope & Cottle Co. v. WheelwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Humphrey v. TotmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Mabee v. HersumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell v. MazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Ross v. RadebaughMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1958
  3. United Neon Sign Corp. v. ZahosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API