Justin Belt Co., Inc. v. Yost
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentSam D. Johnson, Justice
The dissent respectfully submits that the court of civil appeals correctly ruled the noncompetition covenant invalid.
To grasp the effect of the majority’s holding, the circumstances of the parties’ relationship to each other must be understood. Joe Yost worked as an employee of Justin in the belt business and Roger Souder worked as an employee of Justin in the boot business. Each worked in a managerial capacity for an extended number of years. Neither employee at any time contemporaneously with or during the period of his employment executed any kind or character of noncompetition agreement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Novelty Bias Binding Co. v. ShevrinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Chenault v. Otis Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Potomac Fire Ins. Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Ventura Manufacturing Company v. LockeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Brooks Gas Corporation v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.