Legal Opinion

Proulx v. Keene

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 29, 1960No. 4809PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

By statute towns and cities are required to provide and maintain public dumping facilities, unless exempted from doing so by order of the State Board of Health. Laws 1955, c. 275, ss. 2, 3 (RSA 147:23, 23-a (supp.) ). The defendant argues that its motion to dismiss, made in advance of trial, was erroneously denied because the court is without authority to enjoin it from performing its legal duties. Clough v. Verrette, 79 N. H. 356; Rhyne, Municipal Law 797. The plaintiffs’ bills however did not seek to enjoin the city from operating a dump, but from operating a “burning dump” on the premises…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robie v. LillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  2. Morris v. CiborowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Ferguson v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. Kenneth E. Curran, Inc. v. Auclair Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API