Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Rosenfeld

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 23, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, C. J.

These are two bills in equity seeking to set aside a mortgage on the ground that the mortgage note was altered fraudulently after delivery. The cases come before us on frivolous bills of exceptions concerning which perhaps it would be enough to say that in this court a charge of fraud is regarded as something more serious than a rhetorical embellishment, that if a man puts his case on that ground he must maintain it on that ground or lose it, and that the plaintiff’s own evidence made it abundantly clear that if there was any fraud it was not on the defendant’s side. But we will deal with the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brackett v. . BarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Shurtleff v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Curry v. ColburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Jefferds v. AlvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Kidder v. GreenmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Wireless Specialty Apparatus Co. v. PriessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Diebold Safe & Lock Co. v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. Brockton Young Men's Christian Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API