Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Richardson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1850PublishedCited by 14 opinions

A motion was made in the Supreme Conrt to dismiss the appeal in this cause. .

1Opinion of the Court

Lyon, Special J.:

This is' a bill to settle an insolvent estate. Certain creditors not being made parties by the bill, come into Court, defend, and appeal from the decree of the Chancellor to this Court. The bill' of exceptions states that the creditors appealing, have been regarded as parties; but there is no order of record' making them such. The proper practice is, for the creditors to come in by petition and have themselves made parties.1 The recitals in the record afford sufficient ground to- award a certiorari to *67the Court below to send up a more perfect record. If that is not desired…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Berger v. . VarrelmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In Re Thompson's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Garnett v. MeyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Collar v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People ex rel. Bibb v. Mayor & Common CouncilIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API