Legal Opinion
Freudenthal v. Hebrew Pub. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 2, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
This action is brought to restrain an infringement of a copyright of a musical composition and for damages. The complaint is framed in two causes of action. Both allege that between January 1, 1934, and May 16, 1939, Sh. Shalom and Moshe Rappaport, citizens of Palestine, created, composed and wrote, respectively, the text and music of a musical composition entitled Hora Haemek Hu Chalom, that on May 16, 1939, plaintiff received from the Register of Copyrights a certificate of registration for the composition. The first cause of action alleges an infringement of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- American Tobacco Co. v. WerckmeisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Fred Fisher, Inc. v. DillinghamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
- Houghton Mifflin Co. v. Stackpole Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- M. Witmark & Sons v. CallowayDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- De Acosta v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Remick Music Corp. v. Interstate Hotel Co. of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1944
- Jerry Vogel Music Co. v. Warner Bros., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Edward B. Marks Music Corp. v. Borst Music Pub. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.