Legal Opinion

City of Greenville, Illinois v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 20, 2014No. 13-1626PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

The herbicide atrazine is banned in the European Union but widely used in this nation. The EPA has decided that it is safe; some environmentalists deem it unsafe. Various Midwestern municipalities and water boards charged with filtering public drinking supplies brought this suit against Syngenta, the corporate family that manufactures and distributes the chemical. Those claims were settled. The merits are now irrelevant, but during discovery Syngenta produced many documents. Two environmental groups intervened to assert that the public is entitled to see them.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baxter International, Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Union Oil Company of California v. Dan LeavellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re SpechtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Bond v. UtrerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Shandell Bradley v. Louis AckalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Eric O'Keefe v. John ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Noble Roman's, Inc. v. Hattenhauer Distributing Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2016
  4. Callahan v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Nikki Bollinger Grae v. Corrections Corp. of Am.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API