Legal Opinion

State v. Ogden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2000No. 109704562 and 159701214B CA A99667 (Control) and CA A99740)(Cases ConsolidatedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions on four counts of coercion. ORS 163.275. On appeal, defendant argues, inter alia, that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony about battered women syndrome (BWS) and the “lethality assessment.” We reverse and remand.

On appeal from a conviction, we recite the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Rose, 311 Or 274, 276, 810 P2d 839 (1991). Defendant and complainant began a relationship in 1989 and had a child. Defendant was jealous and abusive. Complainant obtained a restraining order that she later withdrew. Complainant moved to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. NulphCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NorbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Short v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Tush v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API