Legal Opinion

Whitehurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 28, 1995No. 95-01281PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant, Anthony White-hurst, challenges the denial of his sworn motion to declare his concurrent sentences to be coterminous and to award him additional credit for time spent in jail prior to sentencing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse only that aspect of the order regarding the award of jail credit because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record refuting appellant’s allegations. E.g., Summerall v. State, 637 So.2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, if the trial court again denies relief, it must attach those parts of the record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keene v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Summerall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API