Marshall v. Lancarte
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MAHON, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on the Secretary’s motion to amend his notice of appeal or in the alternative for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. After careful consideration of the record, the Court has determined in the exercise of its discretion that the relief request by the Secretary must be denied.
I
The following facts are not disputed.
1. On October 9,1979, the Court entered judgment in CA 4-76-266-E. On the same day the Court also entered judgment in CA 4-77-160-E. Both actions involve the same parties, and both involve violations of federal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Albert M. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., Albert M. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Jacqueline Selph v. Council of the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brian Atwood Wansor v. George Hantscho Co., Inc. v. W. R. Bean & Son, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- James P. Pasquale v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Preble v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981