Legal Opinion

Reed v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 25, 1946No. 4 Div. 415PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

In Barnett v. State, 89 Ala. 165, 7 So. 414, 415, it is said:

“The general rule unquestionably is that the advice of counsel can afford no protection against the punitive consequences of criminal acts. Whatever the rights of a defendant are in respect to the doing of the act charged, they are available to him in defense, whether he was advised of them or not; and no amount of assurance, even from those learned in the law, of the existence of rights in the premises, which in point of fact do not exist, can justify or excuse an act otherwise criminal. The giving of such…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Weston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870
  5. United States v. StanleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  3. Barbee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Head v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API