Matter of Christian v. New York City Employees'ret. Sys.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the majority at the Appellate Division that the medical board was not arbitrary or capricious in its unanimous conclusion that appellant had failed to sustain his burden of establishing a causal connection between the incident of July 10, 1975 and his disabling cataracts. The board explicated the rationale behind its decision, that decision was warranted by the evidence before the board, and, the issue of causation being one for medical judgment, the board of trustees was entitled…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Meyer v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Tobin v. SteiselNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Causarano v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Russo v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Shedd v. Board of Trustees of Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.