Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Violet v. Picillo

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided November 20, 1986No. Civ. A. 83-0787 PPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER *

PETTINE, Senior District Judge.

This action is brought by the Office of the Attorney General of Rhode Island to recover cleanup costs incurred as a result of its efforts to clean up large quantities of hazardous chemical waste alleged to have been illegally dumped at the Picillo farm in Coventry, Rhode Island. In addition to her own cleanup, monitoring and closure costs, the plaintiff seeks recovery for damage to the state’s natural resources, the alleged result of waste disposal at the Picillo site. The plaintiff brings suit pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  2. Dedham Water Company and Dedham-Westwood Water District v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  4. United States v. BlissDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1987
  5. United States v. Marisol, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API