Legal Opinion
Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Marvin
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stephen G. Crane, J.
These proceedings to stay arbitrations present common issues. Primarily, these are: what constitutes participation in arbitration; and can jurisdiction be obtained over a claimant simply because he or she agreed to arbitrate pursuant to the rules of a tribunal located in New York. These proceedings are consolidated for purposes only of this opinion.
*14KIDDER PEABODY PROCEEDING
Petitioners (hereafter Kidder Peabody) are a broker-dealer and its account representative with respect to a securities brokerage account maintained for respondent Donna L. Marvin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In Re the Arbitration Between National Cash Register Co. & WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- In Re Arbitration Between De Laurentiis & Cinematografica De Las Americas, S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Hull Dye & Print Works, Inc. v. Riegel Textile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. ShaddockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. McLeodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Allstate Insurance v. KhaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Painewebber Inc. v. McAdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. BarnumNew York Supreme Court · 1994