Legal Opinion

Carvel Corp. v. Burstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In consolidated actions to recover damages for, inter alia, breach of contract and fraud, Thomas Carvel appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered December 27, 1983, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the action as to him. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, motion granted, and action dismissed as against Thomas Carvel. In April of 1973, Irving and Peggy Burstein, after hearing radio commercials aimed at soliciting prospective Carvel franchisees, contacted Carvel Corporation in order to obtain information regarding…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rule Resources, Ltd. v. Reliance Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guzman v. Estate of FlukerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Maravalli v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Carvel Corp. v. BursteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Latimer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Inavest Enterprises v. TRW Title Insurance of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API