Carbone v. Mackchil Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Lawrence, J. (dissenting).
I dissent.
The problem involves the application of the rule regarding the duty, if any, of the defendants to the injured persons. Counsel are in agreement that the rule of responsibility of the owner of real property is substantially the same whether the injured persons were trespassers or mere gratuitous licensees, and that the only duty of such owner is to refrain from willful and intentional injury. The most favorable view which can be taken of the evidence is that the injured boys were gratuitous licensees. As to them the owner' of the premises is only chargeable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Walsh v. Fitchburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Mendelowitz v. NeisnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Potter v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Barrett v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.