Legal Opinion
Sibley Mortgage Corp. v. Sobotica
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John W. Grow, J.
Each of the within actions, denoted Action 1, Action 2, and Action 3, is a foreclosure of a real estate mortgage. In each case the mortgagors defaulted; the defendant banking institutions made limited appearances.
Each case has proceeded to submission of a proposed judgment of foreclosure; in each case plaintiff is represented by Shapiro & Kreisman, Esqs. That firm requests reasonable attorneys’ fees, chargeable to the respective mortgagors, for foreclosure legal services in representing each mortgagee. The first issue presented is the entitlement to those…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lipton v. SpecterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Vardy Holding Co. v. Metric Resales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Community Savings Bank v. ShaadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Norstar Bank of Long Island v. StradfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vacation Village Homeowners' Ass'n v. MordkofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. DoughertyNew York Supreme Court · 2002