Osborne v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fisher, Associate Judge:
Appellant Jeremy J. Osborne was convicted of operating a motor vehicle after his driver’s license had been revoked (“OAR”). At his bench trial, Mr. Osborne presented evidence that he had not received notice informing him of the revocation before his arrest. Mr. • Osborne contends that, under these circumstances, the District was obligated to show that it had sent him notice before he could be convicted of OAR. We clarify the legal standard that applies and remand the case for a new trial.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On August 10, 2013, Metropolitan Police…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CaslerIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- State of Iowa v. Deshaun Marvin Lamar WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Cummings v. D.C. Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- State of Iowa v. Deshaun Marvin Lamar WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Zorgani v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026