Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Schulenburg

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 10, 2005No. 1 CA-CV 04-0438PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

¶ 1 While' off-duty, Appellant Elizabeth Espinoza, a Phoenix firefighter and emergency medical technician, stopped to render assistance at the scene of an accident involving Appellees John and Debra Schulenburg and their daughter, Carrington. Espinoza was injured at the scene by another driver and later instituted this action, which included the Schulenburgs as defendants under the rescue doctrine. However, the trial court held that the fireman’s rule precluded Espinoza from attempting to impose liability on the Schulenburgs and dismissed them as defendants.

¶2 In this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Heck v. RobeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Garcia v. City of South TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Espinoza v. SchulenburgArizona Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API