Legal Opinion
Polasek v. Gaines Bros.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 31, 1945No. 11460PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
This suit was instituted by Joseph J. Polasek and wife, Alma Polasek, against N. O. Drago'o and his employer, Roy Gaines, doing business under the name of Gaines Brothers, seeking to recover damages resulting from a collision between an automobile driven by Alma Polasek and one driven by N. O. Dragoo and owned by Gaines Bros. Providence Washington Insurance Company intervened seeking sub-rogation insofar as property damage to the Polasek automobile was concerned.'
The case was tried to a jury and submitted only upon the theory of discovered peril, upon which issues the jury…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Samonthia v. AhasaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Johnston v. SelfeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Anderson v. Detroit Motorbus Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Stotts v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minugh v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Allen v. De WinneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. HastingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Marybeth Nelson, as Adminstrator of the Estate of Rachel Hargraves, Zachary Hargraves, Wayne Hargraves and Michelle Hargraves, as Next Friends of O.H and L.H, Tony King, as Next Friend of A.K, Zachary Dulevitz as Next Friend of R.D, Christopher Lowrey and Jessica McCuiston v. H & E Equipment Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2023
- TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. HastingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955