Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 & City & County of Honolulu, Environmental Services

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2008No. 28110PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

WATANABE, Presiding J.

The question we must address in this appeal is whether, under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 658A-25(c) (Supp.2007), which is part of the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (RUAA) adopted by the Hawaii Legislature in 2001 and codified in HRS chapter 658A, Union-Appellant United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO (UPW or Union), representative of real party in interest Dennis Motonaga (Motonaga), was entitled to an award of attorney’s fees incurred during a proceeding filed against Mo-tonaga’s employer, Employer-Appellee City and County of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ranger Insurance Co. v. HinshawHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Kona Village Realty, Inc. v. Sunstone Realty Partners, XIV, LLCHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  3. AURC III, LLC v. Point Ruston Phase II, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Nishimura v. Gentry Homes, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  5. RT Import, Inc. v. Torres.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API